Donald Trump issued a grave warning in Waterloo, Iowa – the world is on the precipice of nuclear war. Russia’s aggression, China’s ambitions and America’s weak leadership under Biden have brought us to the brink of catastrophe.

Trump declared that only his courage and vision can pull us back from Armageddon. He called out Biden as dangerously unfocused and weak. Putin sees vulnerability and acts with impunity. The risk of miscalculation grows daily.

Vigilant leadership is urgently needed, and Trump stands ready. He will bravely confront the forces of tyranny where others waver. And he will staunch the uncontrolled flood of migrants across America’s borders.

To supporters, Trump speaks common sense and champions US interests. Critics attack his rhetoric, but he never retreats. The stakes are ultimate – the survival of our nation and civilization. To avoid annihilation abroad and dissolution at home, Trump argues we must choose him to lead America and the world again. The clock is ticking.

Donald Trump took the stage in Waterloo, Iowa to thunderous applause from the crowd. They had gathered to hear the former president speak on the grave threats facing America and the world. 

Trump warned that the danger of nuclear war and World War III is higher now than ever before. He stated unequivocally that he is the only presidential candidate with the ability to prevent catastrophe.

Trump cited the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine as exhibit A in the case for the precarious state of global affairs. He reminded the audience of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s belief that if Trump were still president, Russia would never have invaded Ukraine. 

The truth of this assertion was self-evident to all those present. Trump’s strong leadership and deft negotiating skills would have deterred Putin from his imperial ambitions. 

But under feeble Joe Biden, Russia sensed profound weakness and division in the West. 

In Waterloo, Trump outlined again and again how close the world is to nuclear conflagration. He described with chilling precision how modern thermonuclear weapons have unimaginable destructive power. 

Donald Trump has consistently warned about the dangers of nuclear proliferation and the risk of stumbling into World War III. Based on recent events, these concerns appear well-founded. Russia’s development of new nuclear-capable missiles like the Sarmat ICBM represents a serious escalation of tensions.

The Sarmat is a next-generation weapon with expanded range and carrying capacity compared to legacy rockets. Russia claims each missile can deliver 15 nuclear warheads to targets across Europe, the UK and North America. Deploying the Sarmat fundamentally shifts the nuclear balance of power and feeds an accelerating arms race.

Trump recognizes that nuclear brinkmanship has returned as a tactic of aggression. Russia is using explicit nuclear threats to intimidate and subjugate neighbors. The Sarmat deployment also allows Russia to strike Western nations in retaliation for aiding Ukraine. This lowers the threshold for nuclear exchange through miscalculation or misperception.

At the same time, Trump understands that weakness and equivocation only embolden expansionist powers. Feeble responses to Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling invite future nuclear blackmail. Trump would restore deterrence through military strength and economic energy independence.

Trump’s warnings about World War III reflect rational concerns, not excessive anxiety. Russia’s actions prove that major warfare remains possible in Europe. Putin aims to reconstitute spheres of influence lost after the Cold War. Other revisionist powers like China and Iran have similar ambitions that risk sparking larger conflicts.

Only vigorous American leadership can contain these threats. But Joe Biden projects weakness that encourages adversary aggression. Trump would reestablish military dominance and strategic clarity to prevent escalating tensions from turning into global conflagration.

In sum, Trump’s urgent warnings about nuclear war and World War III are well-founded. Russia’s deployment of new ICBMs capable of destroying America underscores the need for vigilance and strength. Trump understands the profound risks and will act decisively as president to achieve peace through preparedness.

We believe nuclear tensions stoked by Russia would probably not be so severe had Trump remained president. Despite mainstream media caricatures, Trump consistently sought to establish an open line of communication with Putin. He placed engagement over confrontation, understanding this best avoids escalation. Trump’s type of leader-to-leader dialogue allows each side to frankly air grievances, red lines and interests. 

This personal rapport builds trust critical during crises. Putin likely recognized that precipitous aggression would jeopardize his relationship with Trump. But Putin holds Joe Biden in contempt after his humiliating Afghanistan withdrawal. 

Putin saw weakness and tested Biden with the Ukraine invasion. Yet effective deterrence requires projecting strength and resolve, which defined Trump’s approach. In short, had Trump still occupied the White House, his very different rapport with Putin could have forestalled Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling and adventurism. Tensions would likely be lower, benefitting global stability and American interests.

In his speech, Trump has made it clear to us that he considers it his personal mission to save humanity from nuclear demise. He is ready and willing to negotiate directly with Putin and other world leaders to build a framework for peace. 

Trump also pointed out the stark contrast between his leadership and that of Joe Biden. Biden has allowed tensions to spiral out of control. His constant gaffes and mental lapses have reduced respect for America across the globe. 

It is becoming evident by the day that Biden is cognitively simply not up to the immense challenges of the presidency. 

Trump also noted the irony that Democrats simultaneously consider him a fascist dictator while also believing he is not tough enough to stand up to real despots like Putin. 

In reality, Trump represents the last best chance to contain Russia and China and thereby secure peace. Trump will say the hard truths and make the difficult choices that establishment politicians shrink from. 

Under the current state of the world, we understand that Trump was not exaggerating or engaging in hyperbole. When he says the planet has never faced greater peril, he speaks with authority. 

Unlike lifelong politicians, Trump has actually built a worldwide business empire. He knows the major players on the globe personally and has an instinctive grasp of power dynamics. 

In his speech, Trump also emphasized that the border crisis threatens the long term viability of the United States. He cited the urgent need to staunch the unrestricted flood of illegal immigrants into the country. 

Trump boldly stated that unchecked immigration is “destroying the blood of our country.” Critics may cynically misrepresent this as echoing fascist ideology. 

True to Trump’s predictions, at an event with the Wisconsin Black Chamber of Commerce, Biden directly rebuked Trump’s recent statement that immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of America. Biden stated “I don’t believe, as the former president said again yesterday, that immigrants are polluting our blood. The economy and our nation are stronger when we tap into the full range of talents in this nation.” 

The president portrayed Trump’s language as racist and divisive. He presented a competing positive vision of immigration as a source of national strength and a benefit to the economy. Biden’s remarks underscore the highly contrasting views on immigration policy and rhetoric between the current and former presidents. This has become an area of intense partisan debate.

On Tuesday, Reuters reported that the Biden campaign had sent out an email saying Trump’s language echoed statements made by dictators like Hitler and Mussolini. The campaign specifically cited Trump’s phrase about immigrants “destroying the blood of our country” as parallel to racist terminology used by the Nazi leader. The inflammatory debate over immigration continues to provoke partisan attacks between Trump and his Democratic critics.

In closing, Trump’s speech in Iowa made his positions clear. On the risks of nuclear war and World War III, Trump conveys grave concern and a willingness to negotiate for peace. Trump depicts himself as the sole leader with the courage and acumen to secure America’s future. His words frame the stark choices facing voters. 

To Trump’s supporters, he is the nation’s last hope. 

To critics, his rhetoric evokes dark historical parallels. As the next election approaches, Trump is defining the stakes in characteristically bold and divisive terms. His Iowa address leaves no doubt that the Trump era remains very much alive in American politics.