16.7 C
New York

Philippines Accuses China of Bullying in South China Sea Face-Off


In the heart of the South China Sea, tensions are escalating as the Philippines stands firm against China’s aggressive attempts to remove a symbolic outpost, the BRP Sierra Madre. 

Caught in the middle of a complex web of territorial disputes, international law, and diplomatic tensions in the South China Sea, the fate of the entire region hangs in the balance.

While the Philippines navigates the choppy waters of defending its outpost, repairing the Sierra Madre, and countering China’s aggression, the international community watches closely. 

Could this bumping of heads between China and the Philippines escalate further, maybe even into a full-blown war? And what does this mean for the rest of the region?

Amid growing tensions around the disputed South China Sea, the Philippines is now accusing China of intimidating smaller nations in an attempt to force compliance. The Philippines also pledged to persist with supplying its stranded naval vessel being used as an outpost in the South China Sea.

The Philippines sees China’s actions as unlawful bullying rather than legitimate defense of its claimed territories, and many are wondering whether this year-long dispute could escalate further.

Back in 1999, the Philippines intentionally grounded the ship BRP Sierra Madre at Second Thomas Shoal in the Spratly Islands to serve as an outpost against Chinese expansion into the contested region. Over time, this deliberately grounded vessel at the reef has become an increasingly contentious symbol in the territorial disputes over these waters.

And now, China is pressuring for the removal of the grounded Philippine warship and has tried to prevent Philippine supply boats from reaching it, using aggressive tactics like water cannons, military lasers, and risky maneuvers condemned by Manila. 

China claims nearly all of the South China Sea, despite an international tribunal in The Hague ruling that its claims lack legal justification, which Beijing outrightly rejected.

By obstructing Philippine resupply efforts, China aims to assert its contested control over the region and force abandonment of the Philippine outpost ship. Manila sees China’s blockades and harassment as illegal attempts to coerce smaller nations rather than legitimate defenses of Chinese territory.

Regarding the recent escalations, Colonel Medel Aguilar, spokesperson for the Philippine Armed Forces, stated that China seeks to leverage its greater power to intimidate smaller countries into compliance, accusing China of trying to bully weak nations into submission. 

“[China] wants to use its superior strength, in short, they want to bully small countries into submission. And it is very important for the international community to know that,” he told the Guardian.

According to Aguilar, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has firmly stated that the grounded BRP Sierra Madre warship will not be removed, despite China’s demands. 

“The BRP Sierra Madre will remain there, and will always be manned by our navy personnel. Therefore, you can expect that the rotation and resupply missions will also continue, in spite of the obstruction that China is doing,” he said.

Aguilar also stated that the Philippine military has succeeded in carrying out most of its resupply trips to the grounded ship, though Chinese forces have tried to obstruct these missions. 

His main issue though, is that harassment efforts by Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia vessels are putting lives at risk

On the other hand, China contends that its coast guard has behaved in a “professional and restrained” way when preventing Philippine vessels from accessing the Sierra Madre. According to China, its actions follow the law and represent a restrained approach to the situation.

At a press briefing on Monday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning stated that “China will neither take any inch of territory that is not ours, nor give up any inch of territory that belongs to us.”

She added that “China is committed to settling relevant disputes through negotiation and consultation with relevant countries and will not waver in our determination to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

In essence, Mao Ning reiterated China’s firm stance on defending its territorial claims, whether they’re actually legal under international law or not. 

Ning also went as far as basically telling the United States, which is a Philippine treaty ally, and has also condemned China’s actions, to stay out of it, which has caused tensions between the two countries in the past.

She said the U.S. should stop “interfering in the disputes between China and relevant countries.”

Without big fixes, experts warn the Sierra Madre could soon sink to the bottom of the South China Sea. That would be a big win for China, leaving the shoal up for grabs. It also risks escalating recent scuffles into a full-blown U.S. vs China showdown. 

The Philippines has a choice: repair or retreat. But neither path looks smooth sailing. This rusty warship is creating some choppy waters in the already disputed region.

Aguilar confirms that resupply missions to the ship are aimed at ensuring it remains habitable and provides basic living space for personnel. While repairs have been ongoing for years, the nature and scope of such work is unspecified. 

And regarding resupply missions, the Philippines asserted its right not to provide advance notice to China within its territorial waters in the South China Sea. 

On the other hand, China has consistently alleged that the Philippines has unlawfully trespassed into its maritime territory without authorization while conducting operations to deliver provisions such as food and water to Filipino military personnel stationed on a naval vessel intentionally grounded by Manila at the contested Second Thomas Shoal. 

The Philippines refers to the atoll as Ayungin, while China identifies it as Renai Reef.

The precarious condition of the Sierra Madre raises questions about how long the Philippines can realistically maintain its physical presence on the shoal without undertaking major revitalization efforts.

An international tribunal has already ruled that the Second Thomas Shoal is part of the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, but China rejects this finding as part of its controversial claims over most of the South China Sea. 

Aguilar underscores that Manila is not only defending its national interests by keeping personnel on the Sierra Madre, but also promoting adherence to international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to peacefully settle maritime disputes. 

This stance directly counters China’s expansive territorial agenda in the area. However, were tensions to escalate into direct confrontation, the crumbling state of the Sierra Madre could endanger Philippine forces and draw the U.S. into the conflict.

While the Philippines aims to maintain good relations with China in areas such as trade and commerce, tensions persist over the South China Sea issue that threaten to undermine their overall relationship. 

Aguilar acknowledges that maritime incidents do not solely define the connection between Manila and Beijing. However, he makes clear that the Philippines still feels it necessary to publicly challenge China’s actions and raise international awareness about the risks of its expansionist behavior.

By stating that “We have to call out China to make sure that it also recognises the danger of what its people are doing,” Aguilar highlights the Philippine government’s position that disputes over sovereignty and freedom of navigation need to be addressed before ties can significantly improve. 

In a diplomatic move at the most recent edition of the APEC summit, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. held discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday, aiming to ease tensions in the South China Sea and restore access for Filipino fishermen to their traditional fishing areas.

The meeting signals a proactive approach by the Philippines to address the ongoing tensions in the South China Sea diplomatically.

The outcome of these talks could have significant implications for regional stability and maritime activities, however, things have not yet moved past diplomatic talks and repetitive calls for change, and China still seems to have a strong grip over the disputed area.

Now, what does this all actually mean for the rest of the region?

As the dust settles on this gripping tale of power plays and maritime tension, the South China Sea remains a hotspot of international scrutiny. 

China’s relentless pursuit of dominance clashes with the Philippines’ unwavering defense of its outpost, embodied by the battered yet resilient BRP Sierra Madre.

It seems that the region will remain tense as long as China stands firm on its territorial claims, and the rest of the nations within the South China Sea region will have to work around that, whether that’s through diplomacy, or if they will eventually opt for beating China at their own game by bullying them back.

For the Philippines, it seems that they are facing off against a Goliath in the form of China. Yet the nation stands resolute, navigating the choppy waters of defiance and determination. Colonel Medel Aguilar’s call for global awareness underscores the gravity of the situation, urging the international community to recognize the dangers posed by China’s expansionist actions.

The fate of the South China Sea hangs in the balance, and only time will unveil the next chapter in this unfolding saga.

Related articles

Recent articles